30 January 2012

Where is the Web Going?

---
Here’s the gist:

- Disruptive web innovation comes from changes in interface.
- Interfaces, which make information easier to understand by mainstream users, create world-changing companies.
- The next stage of the web is the Curated Web, which like the stages before, will create massive opportunities for entrepreneurs who see the trend.
---
Is this it?  Really?  Facebook wins, cashes in its chips, and we all go home?
Of course, there is more to come and it’s a future filled with sheer awesomeness.  Within the next few years, technology will improve your life in ways you can scarcely imagine.  But if you’re looking for where we’re headed, it’s useful to know where we’ve been and most importantly, we should know the catalyst driving us from one phase to the next.
Though tech types tend to focus myopically on the laws of hardware innovation, including those written by Moore, Metcalfe and Kryder, these principles focus on infrastructure, which is only the first phase of a rising technology wave.  After infrastructure, technology waves enter a platform and finally an application phase.  It is during the platform phases in particular that entrepreneurs build world-changing companies without much initial capital, a la Gates and Zuckerburg.  How do companies change user behavior so profoundly and produce massive growth, seemingly overnight?
I believe we can we plot the growth of online media companies against a predictive trend, like Moore’s law does for hardware.  The percentage of users creating content is a function of users’ ability.  That is to say, the easier it is to create content the more people create it.  But why should we care about content creation?  Because content creation has exponential benefit to the community and is by definition how online media platforms succeed.  Platforms must enable users to create something valuable for other users; the business’ viability depends on it and the economics won’t work any other way. 
The trend line of the relationship between the percentage of users creating content and users’ ability, plots the history of the web and helps predict what’s next.  It was the graphical user interface, developed by researchers at Xerox PARC and brought to market by Apple and Microsoft, which made hard-to-understand DOS terminals usable and hearkened the PC revolution.  The web browser commercialized by Netscape, took advantage of infrastructure used by academics to help create Web 1.0.  Next, Facebook took technologies like BBS and RSS to the masses by perfecting the Feed.  Smart entrepreneurs, who took a technology mainstream by making it easier to use, spurred each successive phase of the web.  The interface drove innovation by making previously incomprehensible information useful, driving an explosion of new user behavior and creating huge companies along the way.


Welcome to the Curated Web

If you want to know what’s next for the web, look at where the interface is changing.  Listen for where non-technical people say, “There is too much going on!  Who can make sense of it all?”  That’s exactly the cry the founders of companies like Pinterest, Evernote and Tumblr are answering.  These companies mark the dawn of what I call the Curated Web.

The Curated Web is characterized by a fundamentally different value to users than the social web.  Whereas Web 1.0 was characterized by content published from one-to-many and social media was about easily creating and sharing content, from many-to-many, the curated web is about capturing and collecting only the content that matters, from many-to-one.  Like all successive phases, the curated web is a response to the weaknesses of the previous phase. Users inundated with too much content are looking for solutions to help them make sense of it all.  Curated Web companies solve this problem by turning content curation into content creation and, following the predicted trend line, they see unprecedented percentages of user participation.  Each re-pin, re-blog, re-tweet, creates a curated, easy-to-use stream for future information to flow.
By designing new interfaces, and suddenly making information accessible, innovative companies have just begun creating the Curated Web.  By extrapolating the trend line, we can expect new startups to engage even higher numbers of users in creating content by making creation even easier.  As our ability to create content increases, perhaps one day becoming nearly effortless, we are likely to see new interfaces to help us make sense of all the data, and hearkening the next phase of the web.

20 comments:

  1. Have you ever seen a Heron land on water? 

    ReplyDelete
  2. I initially tought that this article was a bunch of marketing BS after reading it, then a little while later I got in a chat with a friend and told him how tedious it is to follow twitter and how I'd wish there was something that could do the job of picking out the things that interest me for me, and I realized you're brilliant :)

    ReplyDelete
  3. This makes totally sense! I just thought about that the other day and also came across sites like musicplayr.com (a curated musicsite). As you said those sites are the next big thing...

    ReplyDelete
  4. I do see a fundamental flaw with curated web that parallels the core problem which resulted in the dot.com burst: actual information.  The dot.com burst was a fundamental problem of not enough programmers actually building technology versus a huge number of users of the technology.  The investment world got lulled into the user growth, rather than basing their investment on actual development growth.  The same that applied to code now applies to information.  Curated web will increase user growth, but the actual information creation will not grow nearly as fast.  Making it easier for someone to create content does not translate to better content, rather I think it will "lower the bar" and risks a information bust.  However, I believe angel investors and venture capitalists have learned from the dot.com bubble and will not be so willing to plough billions into curated web.  So I do not see it being the next big thing.  Now the real challenge for the next phase of the web is inference and trending controlled by the content consumer rather than by the content provider.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Good article. I'd like to stress the importance of people acting as filter while collecting content.

    ReplyDelete
  6. interesting article! curation is definitely in;

    ReplyDelete
  7. Michael AgnichFeb 6, 2012 09:38 AM

    Those of us living in the world of long-tail online retailing have been feeling this pain acutely for a long time. As it turns out, search is really hard (shocker!), and you cannot write a great search algorithm without collecting the right data. Ultimately, this is why every commerce site needs to shift from social features being "nice to have" to "must have". The goal of social for ecommerce should not be to get the most followers, it should be to feed your onsite search and curation experience. Great article Nir - keep it up. 

    ReplyDelete
  8. Hi Nir, interesting and thought-provoking post. However, I'm not sure I understand why you would rank sites like Facebook and YouTube as being lower on the vertical axis (% of users creating content) compared to Pinterest and Tumblr?

    ReplyDelete
  9. For another perspective on curating by the masses, check out Nina Simon's book www.participatorymuseum.org, and her blog www.museumtwo.blogspot.com.  She's been talking for a number of years about how to get strangers to interact each other, both in a physical space and online, to create meaningful content.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Hi Julian, Facebook and YouTube rank lower on the vertical axis because they follow the 1/9/90 rule of content creation typical of social media companies.  
    See:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1%25_rule_(Internet_culture).  
    However, Pinterest and Tubmlr, as curated web companies, engage a higher proportion of users at content creators.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Hi. Thanks for this article. I'm totally agree with you. That's why I want to present you another curating tool that answer this problem: scoop.it . try it it's great! 

    ReplyDelete
  12. Hey James, I disagree with the point of Curated Web "lowering the bar" for content creation. The whole point of curation is raising the bar. The chart above is very clear about "following taste experts" instead of following random low quality content providers.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Serp - I think you bring up some very thought provoking points. My intent is not to give some kind of endorsement to the curated web, but to instead make others aware of its implications. I agree that there will be just as many challenges as benefits with this next phase of the web. As with any new technology, we'll have to understand and cope with the change we create.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Interesting juxtaposition.  I read Fred Wilson's blog yesterday about new media e.g. blogs overtaking traditional.  I happily found your blog today after the techcrunch post on viral.  I have mixed feelings about this topic.  Yes - I am consuming much of my content in a "curated" fashion e.g. suggested by people I trust on email, twitter etc. but...it is Sunday and Sunday for me means curling up with the NYTimes albeit on my iPad - so much content in one place I enjoy.  So either I'm rebounding to web 1.0 or the NYTimes editor is my ultimate curator.  I will think about this more (and probably write about it on my blog too)
    Thanks for all the great food for thought.
    Laura
    www.thekitchensync.co

    ReplyDelete
  15. I got into a conversation last week on how the meaning for curation has changed (been devalued). Museum Curators don't just collect Links (they tell stories, they balance their content, they omit stuff.  Curation as you describe it is the emerging meaning.

    I wrote a post on it here after reading some data on @britopian 's slideshares.

    http://www.nickkellet.com/2012/01/creation-curation-broken-1-9-90-participation-model/

    ReplyDelete
  16. Great blog and great points made here Nir.  I don't know about you but I can't help feeling like "curated web" in relation to services like Pinterest or Evernote or Storify are taking the first baby steps towards evolving into new forms of media similar to how the remix culture is to street art or hip hop. I think the root of the content or the creator is no longer going to be the sole point of interest, but what gets remixed (repinned?) out of it, if that makes any sense?

    ReplyDelete
  17. Fascinating blog Nir, it reminds me of Seth Godin's blogs. Extremely insightful.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Thank you for the compliment Jerry.  Will continue to write about how these trends will change our lives.  Thanks for reading!

    ReplyDelete

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...